My Name Is Khan

Gigantic in ambition, dwarfed in execution, KJo is back to doing what he does best.
1
CAST Shah Rukh Khan, Kajol, Tanay Chheda, Zarina Wahab, Jennifer Echols | DIRECTOR Karan Johar
hype
Human relations in this film are completely artificial, especially the one between Rizwan and wife Mandira (Kajol).

When the melodrama of Hindi cinema involves just Indians, we can afford to be indulgent and say that is how we like our entertainment. But most of My Name is Khan is shot in the US, and deals with situations, individuals and communities across that nation. In this context, the movie is downright embarrassing.

At one point in the film, Rizwan Khan (Shah Rukh), a Forrest Gump-like character who travels across the US to meet the President to tell him that his name is Khan and that he is not a terrorist, halts at Wilhelmina, Georgia. There he befriends a large African American woman called Mamma Jenny (Jennifer Echols), presented as a grossly offensive caricature of black women from the South. Were this a Hollywood movie, there would have been howls of protest from the African American community, including, perhaps, the President our hero eventually meets.

Human relations in this film are completely artificial, especially the one between Rizwan and wife Mandira (Kajol). We are expected to believe that this attractive single mother makes the brave decision to marry a man with disability and then, in an instant, when tragedy strikes the family, asks him to get out of the house. She knows her husband is seriously challenged, but never follows up on him.

My Name is Khan is an expensive and empty vessel that stretches your credibility and patience and whose central premise—all Muslims in the US are not potential terrorists and most are proud citizens—falls flat, primarily because of the naivete of its treatment and the hack job that Karan Johar does with all the actors in this huge production.

Shah Rukh’s laboured Rizwan is a marathon without skill. We have a huge movie star with acting talent that is inversely proportional to his fan following. Combine this with a director who has the same syndrome, and you get My Name is Khan, a movie that is international in the subject it aspires to and so home-grown in its execution that you cringe.

OLDER COMMENTS FIRST

10 COMMENTS

Permalink

At last, an honest review! MNIK is a gross misrepresentation of Americans and their attitudes towards immigrants/Muslims. Americans are some of the most open and tolerant people that I know. Their foreign misadventures aside, immigrants here are allowed freedom of religion and the right to follow their beliefs like nowhere else in the world (think France).
As for the megalomaniac trio of SRK, Karan Johar and Kajol, they need to go back to the NRI tearjerkers that have been their path to fame. A torrent of publicity and a lousy script can only get you so far.

20 February 2010 | Sonia

Permalink

Finally, an honest and true review. Compare this to some national newspaper 5 start review that says SRK is miles ahead of Tom Hanks. That was so funny it hurts. Thanks for saying it loud and clear that the emperor wears no clothes.

20 February 2010 | Ashok Trivedi

Permalink

I am not sure what "marathon without skill" means?

As for the rest, I have not seen MNIK but have seen enough of Khan-Johar productions before to know that it would be filled with ridiculous exxagerations. And I have read enough of film critics in India to know they never take them seriously.

As for treating every race with respect is concerned. one only needs to see those awful scenes from Kabhi Khushi Kabhi Gam where Kajol makes fun of her white neighbour, or those from Kal Ho Na Ho where Khan makes fun of Chinese restauranteurs to know Johar knows nothing on the subject of race relations.

On the other hand, he does have a lot of money to make films on any subject he wishes and a vast audience with no taste to applaud him.

20 February 2010 | skye

Permalink

I haven't seen the film sir, but I suspect this may be one of the rare honest reviews of MNIK.

21 February 2010 | Deepa Gumaste

Permalink

21 February 2010 | Fredj

Permalink

absolute cynical review..grow up ..make a movie and show

24 February 2010 | aaaaaaaaaan

Permalink

Excellent review. I wholeheartedly agree with everything you say. If this piece of garbage is a blockbuster, Bollywood has a long way to go before it can be taken seriously.

3 March 2010 | sacred_cyborg

Permalink

An honest review. All charactarization of MNK are very artificial and some scenes are very silly.

5 March 2010 | suresh

Permalink

I recently read two reviews of my name is khan on open magazine that filled my heart with joy(links above). I wrote on this blog about main hoon na khan the day after it was released. Next day when all the critics in the media were heaping praises on this sorry piece of I don’t know what , I was left wondering if it is possible for Shah Rukh Khan and Karan Johan to bribe all the “critics” in the national dailies. But later I was thinking if millions of people enjoy bollywood melodrama – what right do I have to crtiticize it.

http://getupdated.in/?p=589

7 March 2010 | amaresh

Permalink

Mr Duara or whatever,
When you are out of your depth on a subject, or just do not have the requisite sensibility to review a film, you should opt out. It is better than exposing the badly disguised bigotry that frames your views of modern Indian cinema and attitude towards "the other". Your review reeks of prejudice and your know it, even if you enjoy wallowing in the excited responses you have got for being "honest" about your feelings.

16 March 2010 | Racism Check

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

CAPTCHA
NOTE: Please enter letters [case sensitive] in the box provided before you submit your comment. This is to prevent automated spam submissions
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.