
‘Hindu Terror’! The nomenclature is sheer profanity. The Congress party, it appears, is short of intelligence to find a word that would perfectly demean the RSS. And to target and attack the RSS, the party feels, is a dire necessity for its political survival.
To demonstrate that the RSS is a terrorist organisation, Home Minister P Chidambaram purposefully used the term ‘saffron terror’. But Congressmen themselves became wary; they realised that to so relate the colour saffron to terrorism would be counter-productive. Had Chidambaram known his party’s history, he would have thought twice before using the term. I remember a friend from Kerala telling me that AK Antony, our Defence Minister, had warned the party’s High Command, when he was Chief Minister of Kerala, about the repercussions of any blasphemous use of that word. Everybody knows the colour saffron is a symbol of renunciation and sacrifice. For more than two decades, this abusive usage was shunned. Chidambaram did not repeat it either.
My reading of the post-Independence history of the Congress party tells me that whenever the Congress finds itself in the doldrums, it thinks the RSS is the best bet for its recovery. In 1947, the Congress was at the receiving end for its sin of partitioning the motherland and the consequent massacre of Hindus, rampant dishonouring of Hindu women and displacement of millions of Hindus in Pakistan. The RSS was all praise for the valour and sacrifice of its workers in protecting those hapless people and offering great service to rehabilitate the uprooted. This made the Congress shaky. Even before the heinous murder of the Mahatma, a few leaders including Pt Jawaharlal Nehru had started talking about “crushing the RSS”. Govind Sahai, then parliamentary secretary in the UP government, had published a booklet titled something like Fascist or Nazi RSS and demanded a ban on the organisation. Digvijaya Singh, General Secretary of the Congress, is not being original in comparing the RSS with the Nazis and Hitler’s hatred of Jews with the RSS’s alleged hatred of Muslims; he is simply imitating Govind Sahai.
In 1948, the Congress got a golden opportunity to ban the RSS after the murder of the Mahatma. Mrs Indira Gandhi too had banned the RSS in 1975, after the promulgation of the infamous Emergency. She had no threat from the RSS; the RSS had not demanded her resignation. Those at the forefront of the anti-Indira agitation were rounded up on the night of 25-26 June, but the RSS was not banned at the time. The RSS Sarsangh-chalak was arrested on 30 June, and the ban came four days later at the instance of the CPI. Mrs Gandhi needed their support for her nefarious politics, and the CPI was willing to strengthen her hand.
The present Congress, under the leadership of the new Mrs Gandhi, needs a ban on the RSS—not to finish the RSS but to placate its Muslim vote bank. The Congress party has come to the conclusion that its very existence is in jeopardy. And only en bloc Muslim votes can enliven it. So, they have carefully calibrated a policy to target Hindus. And to do so, condemning the RSS is the easiest thing. Initially I had thought that Rahul Gandhi’s comparing of the RSS with SIMI was a silly outburst of an immature upstart, but after his conversation with the American ambassador—where he tried to absolve the well-known jihadi terrorist outfit Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), saying that more dangerous than the LeT are the radical Hindu terrorist groups—I am convinced that it is a calculated propaganda line. SIMI is banned in our country. The RSS is working in the open. Can there be a comparison between the two? If the RSS was so notorious, then Rahul’s Government ought to have banned it.
It is nobody’s view that there are no fringe terrorist groups among Hindus. But to compare their strength and capacity to inflict widespread terror with the LeT’s is fantastic nonsense. It is common knowledge that the LeT is a state-sponsored organisation. It is a creation of the Pakistan army. It is guided by the ISI. David Headley, the Pakistan spy now under arrest, has corroborated this. Which ‘Hindu’ terrorist group is sponsored and trained by the Indian Army? Does any Hindu group have the social backing or even sympathy of Hindus, as the LeT and other Muslim terrorist groups have of Muslims?
It is well known that Devendra Gupta, arrested on the charge of being instrumental in the Ajmer blast, was an RSS pracharak (full-timer). But what was his status in the RSS? He was a functionary at the district level. The Congress was in dire need of big fish, and they claim they have got one in Indresh Kumar, at present member of the RSS national executive. I have known Indresh Kumar for a long time, since he was provincial pracharak for J&K state. It is reported that Swami Asseemanand named him, and alleged that Indresh had given Rs 50,000 to prepare a bomb. As reported in the press, Asseemanand is repentant. When did he assume this new ‘avatar’? In CBI custody? Was he tortured to become so remorseful? But who can confirm this? If Swamiji felt any penitence for his alleged sin of engaging in terrorist acts, he should have surrendered even earlier. He would not have gone absconding. The police apprehended him only after months of pursuit. Nobody will believe he is regretful even if his confessions are voluntary. My suspicion is that the whole confession is concocted. It is hard to believe that Indresh had a hand in the attacks on Muslim religious places; he is a guiding spirit behind the formation and working of the Nationalist Muslim Forum. Will any sensible person harm his own cause? Even then, presuming that he is involved in these alleged unlawful acts, the Government should arrest and prosecute him. People had heard of Indresh’s alleged participation for months, but he was not even interrogated.
What stops the Government from arresting and prosecuting him? My hunch is that the Government will think twice before taking any rash action. It appears the Congress is only interested in keeping the propaganda-pot boiling, telling people that the RSS is a terrorist organisation. This appears to be the sole purpose of the selective leaks. It is also possible that the Government wants some time to take a firm decision on banning the RSS. If the ban does come, it will be India’s fourth on the organisation. People have seen the effects of the three earlier bans. The motive and method is the same. Paint the RSS as a terrorist outfit, put its leaders in jail under preventive laws, and humiliate and disgrace the organisation. But this is 2011, not 1948, nor 1975.
Everybody knows of the role of HKL Bhagat, Jagdish Tytler and Sajjan Kumar in the massacre of Sikhs in 1984. They were important functionaries of the Congress. One of them is dead. Tytler was put in charge of the 2010 Bihar Assembly election but pulled back after an uproar, and Sajjan Kumar is facing trial. Can we, then, claim the Congress party is a terrorist organisation? How, then, can one Devendra Gupta or one Indresh make RSS a terrorist organisation?
One more difference between the groups accused of involvement in the Malegaon/ Ajmer/ Hyderabad blasts and Muslim jihadi terrorist groups should be noted. The former are reactions, reactions to the sinister actions of these jihadi groups. To hide and suppress the actions and trumpet only the reactions is neither fair nor convincing. Some higher-up RSS functionaries were also interrogated. Months have passed and nobody has been chargesheeted. So, targeting the RSS appears to be just a calculated propaganda ploy to win back the Muslim vote bank which slipped away from the Congress after the Babri demolition. To convince this vote bank, the Congress has coined the term ‘Hindu terror’. It is not only a misnomer, but also highly insulting, insulting in a way to the whole nation. The Congress, it appears, has now become conscious of the adverse repercussions of this hateful terminology and has mended its language. Now, officially, they say terrorism has no colour. They are now talking of majority and minority terrorism. But this quibbling is not going to help the Congress. Unless it sets its house in order, unless it clears its stables and removes the repellent stench of corruption, it has no future. Muslims as well as Hindus are wise enough to know the reality of the Congress game.

























































OLDER COMMENTS FIRST
15 COMMENTS
Permalink
Disgusting, disgusting and funnily so,OPEN. As in the episode of the Radia tapes, when you led the gregarious pack in denouncing nearly everyone who merited a mention, whether it be the the picaresque Niraa Radia, A.Raja,Ratan Tata,Vir Sanghvi , Barkha Dutt or the inanimate INC, DMK and the UPA as well.....we definitely expected you to do something similar this time too, when another new menace had surfaced in the national scene. But lo and behold,here you are, publishing a "right" view(itself an oxymoron) from an organization which happens to be the one under the scanner this time. What exactly has m.g vaidya attempted to say here?he sounds like the same old ostrich "hiding its head " under the Aussie sands. I am really feeling surprised as to why you have vaidya writing a long column of self-denial/congress-bashing in your magazine rather than publishing the aseemanand documents, à la the Radia Tapes. Change of hearts and style,huh?
Well, this is nothing but the same jargon we see being posted by BJP loyalists across the cyberspace(without any proofs to the contrary).
Definitely,better is expected of OPEN.You've always been different . Hope that you do not finally succumb to biases and metamorphose into a mere mouthpiece for such ideas.It will be against the spirit of both "your name" and the principles Sandipan Deb had mentioned in his front-page letter of your opening issue.
Permalink
@Harish:
Why should Open not provide a platform for Vaidya. I am not saying that what Vaidya says is correct, but he has a right to get his point across. He also raises a pertinent point about labeling and generalization. Given the history of the RSS and its role this may be specious - however the basic tenet is correct - that it is wrong to label an entire organization being tainted by the actions of a few.
I think that it's to Open's credit that it given space to commentators and viewpoints from all sides of an issue - instead of being blatantly one-eyed. Commend, rather than berate them for this.
Permalink
Good article by Mr Vaidya. A big thank you to open Magazine for giving him space to bring out his point of view.
It is sad to see main stream media going hammer and tongs against a nationalist organization, thanks to which India has survived the onslaught from the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty.
It is only commendable that Open magazine is not succumbing to the leftist narrative presently existing in the Indian historical and contemporary discourse.
Permalink
First, Open should be appreciated for accomodating a fair debate. Mr. Vaidya raises many valid points, to which the Congress Party has no convincing answer yet. It is appropriate to quote the Wiki Leaks cable "congress party playing communal politics". Recent actions of the Congress Party, indulging in a meaningless blame game without any real action, does go to prove that it is indeed aiming at what can be called AN ELECTORAL MAJORITY VIA COMMUNAL MINORITY. The reality is that most educated people who have of late started to vote shedding their proverbial inconvenience of going to voting booth and standing in a queue in the scorching Sun, are increasingly disgusted with Corruption and its patronage during the UPA regime. Congress is also getting hit on the count of the Gandhi family's Swiss accounts, which they refuse to part with. Personally, I feel the best approach for Congress Party would be to distribute the Gandhi family Swiss cash to the poor or the PM relief fund, pay tax anc come clean, and make a solemn public promise that they will fight against corruption. Let Rahul wear the Gandhian dhoti and give the family a reboot/refresh !! Only that can save Congress now.
Permalink
It is unfortunate that Open instead of taking a balanced view on the matter is jumping the gun.
The terrorist acts were comitted by RSS members or atleast ex-RSS members. RSS DOES NOT represent all Hindus. Neither is the Congress blaming "Hindu Terror" A word not used by anyone except the BJP and RSS to create scaremongering among gullible Hindus.
The issue is simple. RSS and BJP who behave as pseudo-natuionalist or pseudo-Hindu parties are politicising Hinduism to gain electoral advantage.
They are unable to win elections on merit alone and would like to use religion for their advantage. Average Indians as well as educated ones realise that they don't want to go the way of a Hindu version of Pakistan and this is why they resent the RSS aim of a "Hindu Rashtra". This is not because of any hatred to Hinduism but beacuse of their love of Hinduism as a religion and desire to protect it from being misused by the RSS-BJP combine
Permalink
"Does any Hindu group have the social backing or even sympathy of Hindus, as the LeT and other Muslim terrorist groups have of Muslims?"
"One more difference between the groups accused of involvement in the Malegaon/ Ajmer/ Hyderabad blasts and Muslim jihadi terrorist groups should be noted. The former are reactions, reactions to the sinister actions of these jihadi groups."
Why are you publishing such garbage? This has turned me off Open for good.
Permalink
I dont know why people are so bothered with Mr. Vaidya getting his right to say whats on his mind. I am sure some of whom who have called the article "garbage" would have been front line in defending MF Hussain paintings and Salman Rushdie's work trumpeting about free speech. The only speech that needs protection is one that offends someone, why would sycophantic speech need protection at all? So, this is exactly why Open has the right, nay the duty, to publish what Mr. Vaidya has to say. Kudos to Open for doing just that, howsoever much it saddens, scares and turns some people away. If Open were worried about that, we would just have another news source like Hindustan Times, Times of India, The Hindu etc etc...not good for the true freedom of the press.
Plus the reality is, the so-called objectionable statements are ones that many of us have mentioned in drawing room conversations. The fact that Vaidya is saying it on a broader platform in surprising. I must confess to the crime of having thought along similar lines (albeit with lesser intensity that Vaidya) when I hear 'some people' bursting crackers whenever Pakistan beat India in cricket. That is the truth about those specific people - does saying that make me a bad man?
Permalink
ankit, thats an extremely important point you have mentioned. no one except the BJP and the RSS uses the word hindu terror in an attempt to hoodwink emotionally vulnerable hindus and thereby make electoral gains. interstingly, one of the rss' top leaders had once mentioned in an interview that they do not know exactly who coined the word hindu terror. it could either be digvijay singh or someone else.
now, interstingly, they do not know the etymology og this much abused term , yet they would go gung-ho attacking the congress for creating the so-called non-existent hindu terror. impressively idiotic.
Permalink
shan, you are accusing me of something i have not done. nowhere am i claiming RSS to be terrorists and so forth. my post was meant to compare the attitude of OPEN in the two recent issues which have caught the nation's imagination.the radia tapes, which OPEN pursued with a religious zeal and have come down hard on the journalists under scanner., and this one, where OPEN, instead of reporting the issue first with the inputs from investigative agencies, have taken a stand akin to the BJP"S celebrated "all-who-accuse-the-sanghparivar-of-wrongdoing-are-congressi-fifth-columnists".if this trend continues, someday, will OPEN also begin including Zaid Hamid's columns on how India is planning to create a Zionist enclave in the Indian sub-continent?????think over it. by the way, vaidya has said nothing substantial, except that he and his org are insulated from a phenomena called terrorism by some divine cloth and the congress is the force which is trying to create an illusion of rss members being involved in nefarious activities. so much for his "right view"
Permalink
so, are you atleast gonna publish some written confessions of aseemanand or is it all going to be a hallelujah modi and a jai shri yeddyurappa year??
OPEN, are you really sold out to the RSS?dint expect this atleast.
Permalink
So many comments by the anti-RSS, but not *one* that could show any facts or logic - they just vomited their intolerance towards RSS. Exactly what cong did for decades. Congress has its reasons - facts of history are so glaringly against congress. In such cases the congress either makes sure it creates sufficient noise and not really get to the point, or maintains a conspiracy of silence. The way bulk of academia reacted with conspicary of silence towards the literature produced, with evidence and logic, with irrefutable conclusions drawn by the likes of Sitaram Goel and Ram Swarup. Since congress had the political power, it is going the other way.
Folks, did Aseemanand confess? There is never a statement of his confession, no admission of guilt. There is *nothing* to report, and if there was even a little, the cong and every news channel would have been talking of just that.
Permalink
Folks, there is no confession by Aseemanand in the first place. There is no admission of guilt, no confession. And if one went through the line of argument presented by CBI that part is obvious and the way they linked Aseemanand and Sunil Joshi was even more ridiculous.
And Mr. Harish - what "substantial" things have you said? At least, the author takes pain to quote instances that prove his point. Did you have anything to offer?
Secondly, "Hindu Terror" is not a word used by BJP - it is coined by the congress and objected-to by the BJP. It is ridiculous to talk of the objection and not the initial coining of the word itself. If you have been around following the happenings, this is only a continuation of the practice. The words like "Hindu Fascism", "The Axis" were in academia for many years, propagated by the communist academicians. Then the tide subsided, another tide of "Hindu Tabilan" came up. When that was also fought out, now this "Saffron Terror". In short, calumny never ended but only changed forms. And people's attitude of pushing the blame onto victim, has also not changed.
Permalink
"Why are you publishing such garbage? This has turned me off Open for good."
Again, what evidence did you provide to say that is garbage? You want people to write on the lines of what you think, but not in line of what is true?
Permalink
kumar, so you are entirely sure that neither is aseemanand involved in any nefarious act, nor had he made any confession . so, even the confession letter is a farce. this is what "strruthiousness" really means.the very point i had raised about "substantiality".
i do not have anything substantial to prove the rss innocent, since it is not so. its proffs of guilt are all over for indians to see. just that the ultra-orthodox section refuses to see it even if the clues are dangling by their wardrobes.
what do you offer, kumar , except that the whole of the indian liberal class is against hinduism, the same old rant we have been hearing from nearly every sarsangchalak post gandhi? if you have anything definite to share about the innocence of sadhvi, indreash, assemanand, et.al, please do entertain us.
also, give a valid link if you can, as to who from the congress coined hindu terror,this oft-abused phrase, if you are able to. lets see how many points you score out here?
Permalink
"Again, what evidence did you provide to say that is garbage?"
provide evidence that it is not.
"You want people to write on the lines of what you think, but not in line of what is true?"'
is what *you* think the gospel truth? that seems to be the mindset of both hindu and islamic fundamentalists alike.
Post new comment