
For some reason I cannot get rid of a visual in my head that keeps playing in near perpetuity, a visual that does not exist—Dr Shashi Tharoor turning to the camera in slow motion, his hair flying and then settling down strand by strand. And there is a background score of a soprano singing with expanded vowels, “saauft and baauncing haair.”
It is hard to miss a mild national contempt for Tharoor, an inner Indian guffaw that condemns him not for impropriety but for being 54 and physically flamboyant. There is something entertaining about him in a farcical way: his suspicions of his own good looks, his dyed hair that falls in self regard, his aspiration to remain young, his accent that he appears to have acquired after the same head injury that Jaswant Singh suffered, his surface perfection which has the quality of a peacock dance, a being that is organised to hunt for the best available female. Why do we smile at such a sight? Why is it that men of a certain age cannot be dashing without becoming a spectacle?
In India, especially, as middle-aged men increasingly refuse to behave like middle-aged men, their attempts at being hip are punished by a vague unspoken rebuke. In older times, the subject of ridicule was the wig. Now, the world has become larger, there are many more things an ageing male can do, but the smirks against his vanity are the same. He cannot lift weights in the gym without eliciting unflattering opinions, he cannot tuck his T-shirt into his denims without appearing to aspire for something he should not be aspiring for, he cannot use the word ‘dude’ without sounding silly.
From this trial of perception, actors alone are exempt because they are meant to be spectacles anyway. So Amitabh Bachchan’s borrowed hair is not a sign of his desperation to be sexually relevant, but a form of business strategy that maintains the Amitabh Bachchan of our imagination—a three-dimensional surface that talks and dances. But this kindness is granted only as long as the actors remain artistically potent. For instance, when Dev Anand is described as an ‘evergreen hero’, it is not entirely a national compliment, as he imagines. ‘Evergreen hero’ is pronounced with a soft chuckle as if he is a clown not to reveal the full degradation and disfigurement of his age.
The dignity of age, which inspires the old to behave old and look old, is not a requirement that they have of themselves. It is, like a well-drafted will, an expectation that others have of them. But why do people want old men to be diminished and contained, why should they be physically modest? And why are they ridiculed when they assume the symptoms of youth? Could it be that they are unwanted competition in the mating game, unwanted by both young men and young women? The human disgust at the thought of the old aspiring to mate with the young is an evolutionary force that dwells in every person, except the old beneficiaries.
This disgust is a brooding theme in JM Coetzee’s extraordinary novel Disgrace. A middle-aged professor has an affair with a young student, he faces a trial, and is forced to quit his job in disgrace.
‘…That was what the trial was set up to punish, once all the fine words were stripped away. On trial for his way of life. For unnatural acts: for broadcasting old seed, tired seed, seed that does not quicken, contra naturam. If the old men hog the young women, what will be the future of the species? That, at bottom, was the case for the prosecution. Half of literature is about it: young women struggling to escape from under the weight of old men, for the sake of the species.’
So is that at the heart of it all? A species rebukes its flamboyant old men because it suspects that they want to have a chance with the young, an aspiration that must be crushed because old men should not be allowed to transmit their impoverished semen.
But sometimes one wonders why the old try so hard to be young. After a near lifetime, isn’t there a great peace in finally giving up, in greying, balding, decaying and dying? Isn’t there peace in just letting go? Or is it something that only the young can say in the luxury of not knowing what it is to decay in plain sight?


























































OLDER COMMENTS FIRST
13 COMMENTS
Permalink
Touched a chord somewhere there, my man. The closing paragraph clinched it.
Permalink
nice one!!!
Permalink
>>because it suspects that they want to have a chance with the young, an aspiration that must be crushed because old men should not be allowed to transmit their impoverished semen.
Umm.. I think we have got it slightly mixed up here. Though it's probably true in India, in the west, slightly older and wealthy man is in demand precisely because he is perceived to be winner - in evolutionary terms. He has survived it, is doing good and is an able provider of the needs of the wife and the future generation.
Permalink
Jesus....this is one of the most sexist and downright rude article,please let people deal with age in their own way.Nobody has the right to dictate on how men shoud look/dress at post 40.I think post 40 gives you the freedom to be and look whatever you want...please let the dudes dress up, for god's sake
Permalink
Loved it :)
Thank you for voicing the emotins of young women!
Permalink
What a well worded insight into male behaviour visavis growing old. It is true that old people are now taking more and more time to recognise their age and behave accordingly. The traditional quadrants-of-lifecycle stages are
1. Student life (study and masturbate)
2. Family life (screw and rear kids)
3. Mature life (advise and yield)
4. Renunciation (wander off and spiritualise)
If you mess up the phases, society will not like it very much. Horny old men have been looked down upon all along through history. Traditional people do not like MF Husain havent you seen before? His balls are too big for conservative bhaisaab-behenji types to suffer, so they will think of anything to go after him. Shashi has a similiar problem, but he needs to mature and actually have the big testicles he is accused of having much to his hate club's discomfort
Permalink
Once again, Manu Joseph's got it right. There is an unsaid " tsk tsk tsk' which goes around when men beyond a certain age take too much care of their hair and skin and looks. Younger men are called metro sexuals but the older lot fops. Wonder what metro sexuals will be called when they get to be 50 something. In Tharoor's case the ridiculous Hugh Grant hair style passes. The quirky toss of the head/hair , that punctuates his witticism, or his smooth rhetoric, however should be left to the younger lot to do.
Permalink
Okay, I'll probably BUY and read this man's book
Permalink
Midnight to Millennium is the book to buy and read, if the plan is to buy and read only one of this man's book. Recommended to all.
Permalink
I do sometimes wonder whether the gents should grow old gracefully, but then i suppose with all the hairdressing equipment around to take advantage of, why wouldn't they want to dye their hair!
Permalink
I have no explanation for their behavior, maybe they just refuse to look and feel old, I admire that, I hope I'll be able to do it when the time comes. I suppose the sale of wigs in India are quite high based on what is discussed here.
Permalink
The original style was followed up by youngsters today.
Permalink
Middle age range is the most productive period in life for men and women. It is interesting to note that sexual impulses -- the symbol of your manhood -- and sexual capacity also start to regress. This organic process is usually denied by the person suffering from the effects -- they try to prove otherwise. If you want to look younger and more attractive, visit the numerous botox clinics along Hampshire, they provide professional botox and dermal filler services.
Andrea
Portsmouth Botox
Post new comment