
“It’s impossible to have a one-night stand in Bangalore,” complains the 30-something lawyer at a GQ event jammed to the gills with women baring their best cleavage. “This city needs a meat market,” agrees his expat friend, prompting the very pretty writer from Mumbai to suddenly declare, “I've had one-night stands!” And then she hastily adds, “But those were years ago, in New York.” The boys slump back on the sofa in disappointment, she wanders off into the night, and my inner Carrie Bradshaw stirs to life, pondering a suitably ‘Sex and the City’ riddle: Are one-night stands as unIndian as apple pie? Does the liberated bharatiya naari only have sex with strings attached?
In the faux India of lifestyle magazines, the modern woman is getting it on whenever and wherever she can. A regular little Lolita, she is perpetually in need of sex advice: on mile-high clubs, sex-dare games, must-have sex toys and 40 things to do naked. Every once in a while, this orgasmic hallucination wavers, if only for one stray Cosmopolitan sex survey. The most recent poll of its readers revealed a mere 25 percent had done the deed with more than one man; only 20 percent had slept with a man “solely for sexual pleasure”; barely 4 percent had experienced oral sex; and best of all, half of them had never tried any of Cosmo’s sex tips.
The numbers are all the more dismal in a self-selected sample of “fun, fearless females” willing to entertain questions about anal sex. Cosmo seems to have drawn the line at one-night nookie, forcing me to conduct an equally unscientific poll of friends and acquaintances. The results are nearly as unsexy, but perhaps more illuminating.
“It’s totally okay for women to have one-night stands. I say go for it,” says Nisha, a corporate high-flier in Mumbai. “But I haven’t had any myself. I’m just not interested,” she confesses a little sheepishly. A dinner conversation in Delhi turns into a Clintonesque debate over the definition of sex. The women seem to think a little drunken fumbling around counts as a one-night stand. The men hold firm on the vast difference between making second base and scoring a home run. A free-spirited artist in Bangalore doesn’t believe in making the right boy wait. “I’m a bit impulsive that way,” she says. But her encounters have inevitably led to relationships, except for one night in, where else, Los Angeles.
There’s a reason why the United States most often stars as the setting in stories of indiscretion. In the sweet land of liberty, a desi woman can hook up with a stranger at a friend’s wedding and leave the next morning in the happy knowledge that she may never see him—or anyone who knows him—ever again. Life in India offers no such comfort.
“Who would I sleep with?” pooh-poohs an old friend. “I see the same people over and over again. I have a fairly small social world.” So do the rest of us. We may be one in a billion, but life in India is like being trapped in a goldfish bowl. We float about in small interlinking, overlapping, merging social cliques. Take a man to bed and you may well discover that he is a cousin of a cousin, knows your old schoolmate in Pune, and is married to your work-mate’s sister. Of the major cities, Bangalore is perhaps the worst. There’s barely two degrees of separation between you and a likely sexual prospect. Everyone knows everyone; and everyone likes to talk. Sex is never entirely safe for a single woman in this town.
For all the hue and cry over our newfound decadence, casual sex remains a dirty little secret even among hip urbanites. Screwing around still makes him a stud and her a slut, 21st century be damned. On my last trip to San Francisco, a friend gaily rattled off her sexcapades in Brazil as eight of us—including my husband—sat at the bar. They featured an eighteen-year old boy, a tour guide, and a sex hotel (though not all at the same time). Just the tour guide would be sufficient fodder for a social lynching back home.
There are innumerable urban myths about girls behaving badly: wild nights at the call centre; horny twenty-somethings at corporate training programmes; middle-aged aunties bedding their gym trainers. Female promiscuity in India is a bit like the Loch Ness monster: vastly rumoured, but rarely sighted.
One such exception is Nikhil. Charming, wealthy, and exceedingly suave, he’s an old-fashioned ladies’ man. Nikhil doesn’t need a meat market to land a companion for a night—a feat he accomplishes with some regularity and seemingly minimal effort. The secret of his success: discretion, discretion, discretion. “You can never talk about it, not even to your male friends,” he says, “That's a huge no-no.”
Nikhil’s other prerequisite for a one-night hook-up: “You have to hit the social G-spot.” Or as a friend put it more bluntly, “You can screw around, but never ever screw down.” “On par maybe, or up, but never down,” nods another in agreement.
The status rule, however, creates a sexual Catch-22. Liberation is a function of class for an Indian woman. But the wealthier she is, the more exclusive her social circle, and thus fewer the prospects for a classic one-night stand. Sex with an insider requires careful calculation, a degree of trust, and therefore familiarity. Casual sex, even in the higher echelons, entails some kind of a relationship, usually with a generous dollop of courtship, flirtation, many times romance.
Sexual behaviour is more often about consequences than virtue. The contraceptive pill dealt a death blow to traditional values in the West, and globalisation may well do the same for middle class women in India. More of us now lead the sex-booze-and-cigarettes lifestyle that was once the privilege of the very rich. But will the free market usher in the meat market?
Most likely not. Repressed or liberated, Indians are defined by their social networks. Who we know is who we are. Be it our hair stylist, paediatrician, or maid, no one enters our life without a trusted reference or personal connection. We knew the value of being LinkedIn long before the techies figured it out. If you don’t know people we know, we don’t want to know you, and certainly not in the biblical sense. Chances are that Indian women may never learn to be entirely casual about sex, which will always come with strings attached, the strings that bind our lives.





















































OLDER COMMENTS FIRST
11 COMMENTS
Permalink
How very true! The whole urban identity in India's metros is still in transition, so right now it is anybody's guess which way the scales would tip. But yes, I do agree that as of present, the amount of posturing is tiresome, the covert conservativeness just plain pathetic. Hopefully this cultural schizophrenia around sex and intimacy will flatline as people either unapologetically taking leaps outside their moral/social comfort zones or just not bothering with donning facades for the sake of it. Our society has always been more about the talk. Walking the walk needs a deeper, more subcutaneous, more personal breaking of schemas and prejudices. And the bad news is, people's attitudes and instincts don't change as much as many believe. So a reconciliation with who we are and our cultural identity is as imperative as our Western-style liberation.
Permalink
if anyone's looking for practical advice, the best way for women to go about having one-night stands in a 2 degrees of separation society is, naturally, to look for dissatisfied husbands. discretion guaranteed.
Permalink
may be such a block is limited to the urban India.though things can take a u turn in the rural India.
www.rjvachas.blogspot.com
Permalink
"If you don’t know people we know, we don’t want to know you, and certainly not in the biblical sense"
H.I.L.A.R.I.O.U.S
The Indian male yuppie wants to take pride in his ephemeral nocturnal conquests, but he's held back by his partner-in-crime, who will very likely want something more than just that fling.
Which is rather confusing. Because we have a certain crop of females who're comfortable with the idea of their steady partners sleeping around, as long as the 'attyachar' is purely sexual, not emotional. But what these married, control freak females fail to see is the emotional bond which can develop in their partners' paramours, because ultimately, sex IS different for a man and a woman.
But having said that, it's really pathetic that Indian women fit the all-talk-no-cock bill. They probably know more about Carrie Bradshaw's sexual antics than Carrie herself, and be familiar with all of Erica Jong's works. But when it comes to sex of the zipless kind, they'd put our dear Virgin Mary to shame. Ah well, now maybe that's debatable!!
Permalink
This is the critical line that really resonated for me, the one which many of our ideas of who we are as Indians, hinges on: 'will the free market usher in the meat market'. No, of course it won't, not here. The equation is never linear in this country. More iPhones does not mean you're sexually cool. There's a long evolution in store in terms of sexuality and I don't think we should put pressure on ourselves, as cliques, as networks, as "urbanites" (I hate that word!) to suddenly photocopy a lifestyle that has taken other parts of the world years to create. The strings and ties are going to be important for a long time. I have a theory though, that we will really know when the fabric of Indian society is truly ripping, shredding, becoming something else, when people in mainstream department store chains don't shop as a family and make collective decisions (sometimes autocratic ones) about brands of toothpaste for everyone to use. And I don't mean this entirely facetiously ;-)
Permalink
Swishmonger, zipless effs (!!) aint happenin in a clitillion years in Indian Society, and that's no bad thing at all. Ms Satyrs' Wife, you're bang on, strings are and will be the determinants of carnal knowledge acquisition (and knowledge of many other kinds besides, that's the 'zinda' kahani folks!!), so let them stay attached. Let us get ahead of our self, but not our judgement.
My venture is this: the one important four letter organ the Indian woman has is her MIND. She will think it through. She is not a prude, she is not square, and she is certainly not the all-Sita-no-slit stereotype people here are suggesting she really is. She is also not a fool. So she knows exactly what she wants, and it is not social dictates she is responding to in wrapping herself in these STRINGS, it is her making the most of her fulfillment in the best possible way.
Permalink
Sure, who says strings don't come with their own set of forbidden pleasures? The Indian cougar definitely knows how to pull them, sometimes right under her husband's nose. But if you're saying it's the MIND that's making her do all that, without any obligation to 'Westerndom', it's simply an illusion. The women languishing in certain Islamic states would perhaps think a little peep show of the skin is a sign of protest against the tyrannical regime, and their happiness might know no bounds when they manage to do something that's forbidden by the state. But can you call that fulfillment? In fact, is it even desirable? Yes, it boils down to that cliche -- everything's relative.
Wrapping herself in these strings might mean everything, or even nothing, to the Indian woman. But it lacks perspective. Unless she disentangles her, even if she doesn't wish to, she won't really be able to see how much more she can extract from this pursuit of fulfillment, or happiness. And honestly, I'm not trying to ostensibly promote promiscuity here.
The toothpaste example is too simplistic. We buy the same brand because it's bloody convenient. And really, do you care a fig if the froth in your mouth is mint-flavoured or cinnamon?
I'm sure the "free market will usher in the meat market" line was just a rhetoric. Liberated sexuality is not an offering of the West. The West has only spruced up the sexual-ethic-du jour of our forefathers and sold it back to us.
Can't you Indian women see the light, at least for old times' sake? ;-)
ps: "strings are and will be the determinants of carnal knowledge acquisition"
I wonder why incest seems to fit this description?
Permalink
As an Indian woman, I've never understood the appeal of one night stands intellectually speaking. The Risk - Return equation is so lopsided that it's just not worth going for. I've never had a one night stand and it hasn't been any ephemeral concept of emotion or the fact that he might know my uncle's second wife's best friend that stops me. It's the simple fact that a guy who knows he isn't gonna be getting any from me tomorrow or the day after simply doesn't have the same impetus necessary to make sure the lady's getting her rocks off too. On the other hand, a guy whom you're screwing long term knows that he needs to incentivize sex with him for the lady in order to ensure an encore. Cynically, with the one night stand there is a large probability that your chosen partner of the night might be (a) A Stalker, (b) A Serial Killer, (c) A Moron, OR most likely of all (d) A Disappointment. I'd rather have no strings sex with a tried and true f**kbuddy than with a stranger.
Permalink
Most of the Indian women in this article seem to be having sex with men abroad. Is it really only because of discretion? Doesn't it say something about the short, balding, badly dressed, insecure Indian male who doesn't know how to hold a woman's interest for more than two minutes?
Permalink
The ideas that Indian women a) aren't comfortable with no-strings sex b) are caught in a web of social dilemmas c) have little knowledge about the "knowledge" of cosmo all seem a little archaic.
I lived abroad for a better part of my life and relocated to India recently. I can assure you that Indian women are equally, if not more, sexually liberated than those (Indian) in the US. Starting from the late night out's to the sneaking out during class to even making out during a coffee break at work, women in India have a libido that is quite commendable. They may not need a vibrator or KY, but to term this as ignorance would be equally foolish. If you don't NEED a vibrator, why would you search cosmo for secret tips to attain the big 'O'? (Obviously, I have read enough Cosmo to know these details!) Although it does not surprise me that oral sex is a somewhat new and uncharted arena, the question is, is it because of the women and their unwillingness to experiment? or the unnecessarily large egos of Indian men that makes them believe that going down on their women is demeaning? Whatever the reason, I would like to believe that both men and women are moving toward the "you get what you give" mindset of sex rather than the "I just need to get off" mindset.
www.adashofsindoor.blogspot.com
Permalink
What the fuck is this bitch saying? Shut up about your talk of a western style sexual revolution. India is still a country where 200+ million people don't have access to a toilet or a place to take a shit! India is also home to the largest number of AIDS infected people. Not to mention other STDs. Get out of your fucking bubble. Life is not all about sex and most Indians have more pressing concerns than one night stands. You'll see when you're a wrinkly, menopausal 50 year old with regrets.
Add your comment