Modern Times

Manu Joseph became a journalist because he didn’t have to crack any objective-type entrance exam to be one. His first novel, Serious Men, is the winner of The Hindu Best Fiction Award. It is one of Huffington Post’s 10 Best Books of 2010, and was shortlisted for the Man Asian Literary Prize 2010. He is the editor of Open.

EMAIL AUTHOR

The Hilarious Case of Avatar Tulsi

Why is it so easy to plant child genius stories in the Indian media?
9
Tagged Under | media | fake | child genius
THE KID WHO LOVED RECORDS: Tathagat Avatar Tulsi at IIT, Bombay.(Photo: INDIAN EXPRESS ARCHIVE)

Child geniuses are usually overrated, their future especially. That is the way of the world. In the last two decades,  there have been several children, particularly in India, who were declared prodigies. Their place in the world today, I suspect, is far more diminished than their parents had imagined. Some of those kids were not prodigies in the first place. The genius of such prodigy stories lay not in the children, but in the stories. Tathagat Avatar Tulsi is one such case. The young man who was once called a child genius and is now misleadingly heralded by the Indian press as the youngest faculty ever to be appointed by the Indian Institutes of Technology would not believe his accidental contribution to the fortunes of a writer. But I’ll explain that connection later. 

Tulsi’s father has for long said that his son’s rumoured genius is a consequence of a mystically arranged conception that would not only produce a male child, but also a very smart male child. “It is a science called eugenics,” he told The Times of India recently, probably not knowing what he was talking about. “I and my wife had to plan everything in the process of having the child, right from our diet to our mood to the sex itself,” he said. The result was Tulsi, who obtained an MSc degree at the age of 12. It is not hard to imagine that this feat would inspire the Indian media to call him a child prodigy. Though, in time, the moral of Tulsi’s story would be that a 12-year-old need not have any extraordinary cerebral capacity to obtain a Masters degree from Patna University. 

Soon after he became a postgraduate, his fame helped him gatecrash a group of bright Indian students who were sent by the Department of Science and Technology to Germany to meet Nobel laureates. Here, Tulsi was accused by the other students and some scientists of being a fake genius who mouthed jargon that he did not fully understand. 

Tulsi’s fame as a genius was possible because of a dim media and the gullibility of a few important wings of the Government. I do not believe it was a deliberate fraud. The best way to deceive is to deceive yourself first, and the power of Tulsi’s story probably lies in the conviction of Tulsi and his father that the boy was indeed  a genius. 

About three years after the disgrace, Tulsi resurfaced in the papers for being accepted by the Indian Institute of Science for its doctorate programme. He cleared a test to be accepted. He was 15 then, not an extraordinary achievement for his age because boys who are not much older than that sit every year for IIT’s dreaded Joint Entrance Exam. 

Curiously, Tulsi, who is preoccupied with promoting himself as a genius (his website has a link that says ‘About Me’ and another that says, ‘More About Me’) has not taken IIT’s entrance test. Clearing that test creates the most convincing delusion of intelligence in our country, yet Tulsi has not done it.

Tulsi, always in a hurry to create time records, wanted to finish his PhD thesis in two years. He would take six years to come up with a short 33-page thesis on quantum computing. None of his referees at IISc even hint at a genius. Tulsi is today in the news for being appointed, at the age of 22, as an assistant professor (a non-permanent teaching position) at IIT-Powai. 

A few years ago, when he was considered a child genius, I was desperate to write my great Indian novel. I had made so much fun of the autobiographical debut novel everyone was writing that I knew I had lost the right to write one myself. Tulsi’s story, and a spate of boy-genius-invited-by-Nasa stories made me realise that here was an Indian novel waiting to be written. But I could not bring myself to start. Then one day, I saw a front-page anchor story about Tulsi’s father, and I scrambled to write Serious Men before someone else did.

OLDER COMMENTS FIRST

9 COMMENTS

Permalink

This is a foolishly written article. Doubt is cast on the crediblity of Patna University which is totally illegal and unacceptable and writing such baseless things about a university shows foolishness. Many people fail MSc exam of Patna university at the age of 21 years. Perhaps the writer of the article looks them as a genius. It is a cheap activity to not acknowledge the achievements of Tathagat.
Moreover Prof. Tathagat has cleared CSIR-NET exam at the age of 13. But the writer did not mention it because he could not have dared to question the crediblity of CSIR-NET exam. So who is a genius ? one who does not qualify the NET exam even at the age of 21 years or who crack it just at the age of 13 years? Obviously the latter one and so is the case with the national hero -Tathagat.
Reagarding rumours about Tulsi's Germany trip, it is now well known that a high level conspiracy was hatched by a few liars and frauds to defame him.The then DST secreatry admitted on the very next day that he did not say anything against Tathagat and a crooked journalist lied and wrongly qouted him. He had qualified CSIR-NET before going to Germany. This proves his talent beyond doubt. Then casting doubt over his talent amounts to jealousy,wickedness,ill-will and mental retardness. Only such persons could say that he mugged up without understanding who does not know abc of physics for physics cannot be mugged up and NEt cannot be cracked without proper understanding. Instead of relying on the statements of a few frauds, rely upon the statements of internationally renowned scientists who have praised Tulsi for his genius.
He did not take IIT entrance because he had not done standard 12..His interest lay in research so he did not need to take the entrance exam. But had he taken the exam he must have topped the exam. Clearing NET at the age of 13 and GATE at the age of 14 prove his genius.
It is a bad tendency of not recognising talents. There are a few persons who themselves are losers but wrongly criticize achievers. Such wickedness and jealousy should be avoided. Foregners shower praise on Tathagat but some Indians wrongly criticize him . Shame on them .One must respect- Prof. Tathagat-the pride of India

4 August 2010 | vikram

Permalink

Okay, okay, okay, Vikram, the fella's a genius. Agreed. When he makes a spaceship for the loonie side of the moon, book me a seat, okay?

11 August 2010 | ANON

Permalink

Isn't it easy to plant just about anything in Indian media ?

17 October 2010 | Aneurisms

Permalink

another example of mugging champs in the sub-continent

18 October 2010 | ajay

Permalink

i would have loved this piece if it was just about the absurdity of what has been the Tulsi tale, but right at the tail of your piece, Mr. Joseph, you have indulged in some indigestible promotion of your book by bringing in some trivia about what inspired Serious Men and still inspires your writing (as is evident here)... that's where i realised Tulsi and you are not very different after all... In fact, you are a tad bit more deluded because... well, you have Open to write about your delusions of grandiosity, while the poor bugger can perpetuate his only if the media deem it worthy of their attention...

19 October 2010 | UMan

Permalink

For thos who are interested:

EUGENICS used to be also called a tantric art called "porology". Refer archives.

19 October 2010 | non-genius

Permalink

Hi Mr. Joseph, i just finished reading Serious Men today and thoroughly enjoyed it, though I am still very wary about which friends i should recommend this book to. Of course it is very clear from the book who are the direct inspirations of your story. I myself am from IISc. But it is a bit overkill to sat it all over again in the blog here like this, and in such a brazen way. your book has done the job it was supposed to do, and not subtly too. This blog article is not really adding more good...just ruffling up feathers.

23 November 2010 | joy

Permalink

I agree with you on many points; however the case of Tulsi is a text book case of a"prodigy" in that despite all the (self)deception, he is a talented researcher. That he did not take IITJEE may not be relevant as his interest was primarily in science. "12-year-old need not have any extraordinary cerebral capacity to obtain a Masters degree from Patna University" is also not relevant in his. AT 15 he was admitted for Ph.D. programme in IISc; this cannot be compared with "boys who are not much older than that sit every year for IIT’s dreaded Joint Entrance Exam." ( which is a post-Plus-two programme). No one in IISc believes his work was extra ordinary; but his thesis having only 33 pages doesn't mean anything; it is as good as any other (longer) thesis written by students who are at least 6 years older than him. There are very few sensible writers; I was saddened to see one of them getting carried away.

9 April 2011 | Abhishta

Permalink

Some day....I am going to be a winner over this excessively hyped Dr. Tulsi. He and his father can make comments about being a child prodigy and blah blah, but in the long run, we will see who wins. An over-hyped so called "child-prodigy" or an obscure, hard working, intelligent real "prodigy".

30 May 2011 | anonymous

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

CAPTCHA
NOTE: Please enter letters [case sensitive] in the box provided before you submit your comment. This is to prevent automated spam submissions
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.