Goodfellas

How South Indian cricketers are different
Cricket
Dravid is one of the few Indian cricketers whose reading is not limited to books on cricket and self-help guides
Rahul Dravid is a commerce graduate...
...and Anil Kumble a qualified engineer, both rooted in the South’s emphasis on conventional education

In 1962, India’s leading off-spinner Erapalli Prasanna, already a Test player with a tour to the West Indies behind him, decided to take a break from the game to pursue his engineering studies. He returned to the squad five years later, better educated, and a better bowler to boot, as he reassumed the mantle of India’s strike bowler.

The man who took over in his absence, Srinivas Venkataraghavan, qualified as an engineer too. He was, and continues to be, a man of wide interests—Carnatic music and history, journalism, cricket administration and umpiring. When India resumed cricket relations with Pakistan in 1978, Venkatraghavan was the only player to visit Mohenjo-Daro. He is the only cricketer I know who can mention historian Vincent Smith in casual conversation. What is it about players from the South that makes them different? Where cricket is concerned, the South is another country, with its own culture, its distinct texture. An occasional Bishan Bedi, with his collection of cricket books and ability to quote from them, seems the exception north of the Vindhyas. India’s most successful bowler, Anil Kumble, came through an election to become the President of the Karnataka State Cricket Association, as did his teammate for many years, Javagal Srinath, who became the secretary. Both are qualified engineers.

In the current Indian team, VVS Laxman, having to choose between medicine and cricket, gave himself a deadline before falling back on academics. He comes from a family of doctors. Even a middling record might have been seen as a failure, and the player might well have been the black sheep of the family. By backing his talent, he emerged as one of contemporary cricket’s most popular batsmen, with a record of batting under pressure unmatched by colleagues with better averages and more centuries.

Rahul Dravid, a commerce graduate, would have been a star student even wit-hout the cricket. On tours, he visits bookshops. But his reading is not restricted to books on cricket or the usual sportsman’s diet of self-help and inspirational guides. He is the only current player I know who has read Ramachandra Guha’s India after Gandhi. Recently, he recommended to me Matthew Syed’s Bounce.

Kumble, who inaugurated a festival of Sanskrit literature in Bangalore the other day, is passionate about wildlife and photography, often combining the two to dramatic effect. He has turned author, with Wide Angle, a coffee table book on his cricketing days, containing photographs taken by him. How much of all this is a result of temperament and how much education is hard to tell, but one certainly influences the other.

With cricket’s cradle-to-bank system, it is difficult to imagine teenagers who have made it to Ranji Trophy teams taking a chance on falling behind by deciding to focus on academics instead. India’s finest batsman is a dropout, as is the country’s greatest all rounder (although he was on the rolls of a university for playing). But, as Bedi has said, “Sachin Tendulkar’s university is the university of life. He has learnt more there than he would have from his geography textbooks.”

Interestingly, the more successful you are as a player, the more likely that you will be forced to attend a finishing school where bearing and composure are drilled into you. Advertising agencies round off the rough edges and prepare a player to walk and sound like he means what he says in the commercials. A good example is Irfan Pathan, who, when he first made the international grade, came across as a rough, uncertain, diffident speaker. Today, he is confident, carries himself with dignity and speaks English with panache. A similar makeover is apparent in his brother, Yusuf Pathan.

Of the country’s top ten batsmen (in terms of aggregate runs), only five are graduates; three are from the south. Among top bowlers, six are graduates, five of them from the south. Perhaps education makes southerners more cunning! This is not as far-fetched as it sounds, because spin bowling, the strength of the south, is about deception, of leading the batsman into playing the ball that is not there, of making him believe it will turn one way but sending it the other.

“Education is vital,” says Kumble, whose pet project is a graduate course for players whose education is affected by their playing schedules. It is an attitude that has led to the stereotypical southern cricketer: intelligent, better educated, cultured, modest and better spoken than his counterparts from other zones. Most of them are also steeped in the game’s lore.

In his early days, Kumble was aware of the leg-spin tradition he was heir to—not just Subhash Gupte and Bhagwat Chandrasekhar, but the South African googly quartet at the beginning of the last century. It is unlikely that any international batsman from the South would have said, like Virender Sehwag did after nearly breaking (with Dravid) the record held by Pankaj Roy and Vinoo Mankad for the biggest opening partnership, “I have not heard of Vinoo Mankad.”

Nor would any bowler when introduced to Sunil Gavaskar say, “Yes, I know you are the commentator,” as another India player did.

The two strains worth exploring in the southern players’ distinctive character are Brahminical inevitability, and a conservatism that comes mixed with insecurity. Even before the days of Prasanna, whose father told him he had to focus on his studies no matter what, the southern parent’s mantra has been: academics before sport. It might have mutated into ‘academics alongside sport’ over a period, but we are still some way before ‘sports above everything else’ takes over. Cricket as a career is beginning to be seen as an option, however, but this might be at the cost of education.

Chennai, Hyderabad and Bangalore have traditionally been cities of academic excellence. There is a certain inevitability to a child going from school to university to a ‘safe government job’. The government might have been replaced by an MNC as the aspiration, but, in essence, the story has not changed. Add to that the uncertainty of a sporting future, and the insecurity that comes with it, and the cry is for ‘something to fall back on.’ That ‘something’ in the south has always been education, even among the wealthy businessmen and technocrats who keep the chair warm for their offspring.

In Kerala, the recent success of Sreesanth (an aggressive exception to the general rule on cricketers from the South) might have reversed the process. The conviction that there is lots of money to be made—sport as business—if you are noticed as a talented player is driving a generation. With Kochi now a team in the IPL, where money speaks louder than a Sreesanth appeal for leg before, the trend is likely to gain momentum.

The south has had a reputation for decency in cricket for many decades now. When former India captain Tiger Pataudi found the politics in Delhi overwhelming, he shifted his cricketing base to Hyderabad, where he was happy to play under his good friend ML Jaisimha. Likewise Abbas Ali Baig, who also shifted from Delhi to Hyderabad.

A decade ago, that decency combined with integrity ensured that Indian cricket didn’t collapse as a result of the match-fixing scandal. As captain, Kolkata’s Sourav Ganguly, and as the face of Indian cricket, Mumbai’s Tendulkar, played crucial roles in this. No less important was the contribution of the southern brigade: Kumble, Dravid, Srinath. That India were able to find players of such standing across the country made up for the fact that there was another lot also from across the country who were leading actors in the match-fixing scandal.

Much later, when a television channel approached Kumble to do a programme, negotiations were going swimmingly till he discovered that he would have to share the studio with a player tainted by the scandal. He pulled out of the deal without a moment’s hesitation.

Poise can be taught, culture can be imbibed, and education is not just something you pick up in a classroom. Nor is class something you pick up in an education room. Yet the South’s culture of academics moulds its cricketers.

Indian players have graduated from Oxford and Cambridge, and one of them, Ashok Gandotra, even won a Rhodes scholarship (his other claim to fame being that he is the only player to have been born in Rio de Janeiro). Dilawar Hussain, the heavily built wicketkeeper who made two fifties on his Test debut, was probably India’s most qualified player academically, with a PhD. The Jalandhar-born player was principal of colleges in Aligarh and in London.

But how long will education continue to matter? In the IPL era, would a modern-day Prasanna follow his father’s wis-hes? After watching Gautam Gambhir rake in Rs 11 crore for six weeks’ work, I expect many once-promising youngsters are awaiting telephone calls from their fathers. With an apology for telling them: “Studies before cricket.”

OLDER COMMENTS FIRST

16 COMMENTS

Permalink

If we go by your logic, Pakistan would never have played cricket as most of their cricketers are uneducated. Get a life Menon and write something which makes sense. Wehad educated south indian cricketers like Dodda Ganesh, David Johnson, Sujit Somasunder, Vijay Bhardwaj etc and we all saw what they did. If education was a criteria, then even our great SACHIN TENDULKAR wouldn't have made the cricket team as he missed his 10th board exams so that he could tour Pakistan

14 January 2011 | Rohit

Permalink

Nice article,

15 January 2011 | Deepak

Permalink

Get a life Mr. Menon....this article is nothing but lines of BIAS.....If it would have been just Education vs Non-Education...it would have been fine...but bringing on 'SOUTH' factor is disgusting.......

15 January 2011 | saurabh

Permalink

I am all for education, and understand cultural differences. To choose to write on this topic is meaningless at best, Perhaps the world will be thankful that Bill Gates was not born in South India..

15 January 2011 | Sudhir Desai

Permalink

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the gist of this article seems to be that 'The Gentlemen who play the gentleman's game come from the South'. Regardless of the fact that this article gives me an ego boost since I'm a south Indian myself, I couldnt help wonder if you opinions were ethnocentric or not...after all being a menon, you are a keralite

15 January 2011 | Sanju Vargeese

Permalink

Although I dont see much logical merit in the viewpoint that formal education is absolutely critical for being a successful, complete cricketer/sportsman (as the author himself mentions there are numerous examples to falsify this theory) - but indeed the Southern Indian cricketers definitely come across as more composed, collected, mature and well informed individuals & many have been great ambassadors for the game and the nation.

15 January 2011 | Prantik

Permalink

Mr.Menon sees a streak and chose to follow through with a delivery, which i bet he knew not whether it spins to the left or to the right. Nothing wrong with letting the pitch do something to the ball, now is there? It made for a good read on a sunday morning with my coffee (yeah, i'm from the 'academic' south. so what?). The strong whiff of political correctness in the air assists strong swing too. I couldn't echo the words of 'that' Adam ('Bowlin meyn'! Geddit?) though - the delivery was short-pitched and all over the place.

Anyways, leaving the cricketing parlance to rest, i liked to see a writer expounding further on what was obviously there for everybody to see. That there's nothing more than the brahminical and academic inevitability of the south is a dampener, perhaps.

16 January 2011 | G

Permalink

Not just cricketers... even administrators from South have a streak of cunningness to them best exemplified by N Srinivasan for whom the BCCI has become his personal fiefdom! And as far education is concerned... don't we have Sunil Gavaskar, Ravi Shastri, Sanjay Manjrekar among others from the west? I don't know if all of them have formal degrees but they are definitely educated... And yes Kumble pulled out of a TV show because he had to share space with a match-fixing tainted cricketer... Doesn't a certain Md Azharuddin come from South, the lynchpin of India's biggest sporting shame and it's no secret Mr Kumble still eulogises him!

17 January 2011 | Ravi

Permalink

In general , people from the north tend to be a little(lot?) dumber than those from the south...being dumb and uneducated , the society in general , is more corrupt and immoral...the north has always been that way and it is not just in cricket...this is a social phenomenon and not just restricted to sports....what is the big deal here ?

17 January 2011 | robert

Permalink

Besides the responses it has so far evoked, Robert, i guess there's no big deal at all here actually.

It's just a anachronistic - in times of sensational stories galore, piece-of-life (what many would call inconsequential)- style write up. Writers, just like you and me, can come up with an ordinary day, clearly?Ha ha.

Man, i should discontinue my subscription to this hard copy. Portal's more fun with absolutely all kinds of comments.

17 January 2011 | G

Permalink

That's one sick article !!!
Enough regionalism already floating around, is that not enough for you ???
By the way, aren't these so called educated cricketers wasting there education and govt's money by indulging into Cricket ???? I respect Sachin much more even if he is not that well educated, and I hope you acknowledge the fact that he is the epitome of honesty and dedication.

18 January 2011 | AKS

Permalink

"Where cricket is concerned, the South is another country, with its own culture, its distinct texture. "

Be Careful! Mr. Menon! You might be booked for sedition, all the more considering that you have written this in the Firnagi language- 'Angrezi'.

19 January 2011 | Devender Shetty

Permalink

@ROBERT

"In general , people from the north tend to be a little(lot?) dumber than those from the south...being dumb and uneducated , the society in general , is more corrupt and immoral...the north has always been that way and it is not just in cricket...this is a social phenomenon and not just restricted to sports....what is the big deal here ?"

Right! All Intelligent and Honest to the core People indeed come from South: Karunanidhi and Family, Amma, A Raja, T R Baalu, Maran Brothers, Reddys (and Devgowdas) in Karnataka and Andhra.

Hightime they are all given Bharat Ratna for propagating the virtues of Honesty all over India.

.....and...Robert, Get well soon!

21 January 2011 | Rahul

Permalink

On the whole I think South Indians are a more well educated community of people and in my opinion are also more technically analytic and socially humble. North Indians are more agressive, love to flaunt and are less profesionally qualified but with BETTER business sense. This being said there are 'many' exceptions to the rule.

Rahul Dravid might be an avid reader and that probably helps him have his life well rounded around sports and literature. But if Sachin doesnt quote Shakespeare while hitting centuries on the field I don't think anybody can say his life is unfulfilling. He's a man so many people consider to be "God".

I'm not even going to start with how I feel the Indian education system is not an education at all! So many countries don't even recognize Indian Bachelors , CA and Medical professional degrees abroad.

So, to each is own. Cunningness, corruption or honesty cannot be generalized into a tendency. Moral fiber is never inherited though there may be a predisposition.

10 March 2011 | ~M

Permalink

South Indians are definitely a more respectable lot. Education is respected more than money which is why most South Indians will be educated even if they are moneyed. Sachin is not a North Indian folks. He is a West Indian. Calm down. Like most Marathi Brahmins he is also educated and definitely more humble than another Marathi Brahmin, Sunil Gavaskar. Your community does play a role in your outlook. Which is why Azharuddin, a non Dravidian stands out from the south pack.

11 March 2012 | Kunte

Permalink

Well, there can be two reasons Mr. Menon would have come up with this article...

1. From his childhood days, he might have had an inferiority complex of being from the 'south', and the soul ambitio of his life would have been to find ways to come to terms with it.

2. Mr. Menon would have been suffering from a 'writer's block' for a decade and in an impulse would have come up with this piece of gibberish that masquerades itself as journalism.

And Open, what is it up with you guys? On one hand, you enlight us by getting Mohsin Hamid to write one for you, and the very next moment subject us to a rudderless literary piece. Sad...

13 March 2012 | Rahul Pandita

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

CAPTCHA
NOTE: Please enter letters [case sensitive] in the box provided before you submit your comment. This is to prevent automated spam submissions
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.