injustice

Hartosh Singh Bal turned from the difficulty of doing mathematics to the ease of writing on politics. Unlike mathematics all this requires is being less wrong than most others who dwell on the subject. He is the Political Editor of Open.

EMAIL AUTHOR

A Media That Looks Away

Narendra Modi deservedly rouses cries for justice, but who will report the truth about Kamal Nath?
8
Tagged Under | Narendra Modi | Kamal Nath | 1984 | riots | 2002
On a visit to Canada, India’s Transport Minister Kamal Nath faced a boycott by prominent Canadian MPs, ignored by Indian media. (Photo: AP)

I see an injustice. Even as the Indian media, rightly so, has been filled with reports of Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi being questioned by the Supreme Court appointed Special Investigation Team, an event in Canada has gone unreported. The recent visit of Kamal Nath, Union minister of road transport and highways, to the country triggered the ire of Sikhs who have not forgotten his role in the 1984 massacres, when he was part of a mob that set afire two Sikhs within sight of Parliament at Rakabganj Gurdwara.

Surely the events in Canada were worth at least one news story, to say nothing of attracting the attention of India’s otherwise frenzied TV anchors. Robert Oliphant, Canadian MP and co-chair of the Canada-India forum of MPs, was quoted saying he chose not to attend a reception for Kamal Nath once he learnt of the man’s questionable character and allegations against him. Jack Layton, leader of the New Democrat Party, which controls two provinces in the country, issued a press release: ‘The New Democratic Party of Canada is concerned that a divisive and controversial Indian politician, Kamal Nath, has been invited to Canada… Out of respect for the Canadian Sikh community, I am urging my caucus not to attend events featuring Kamal Nath.’

Where, in all this, were the liberal South Asian voices from North America that were so easily mobilised against Narendra Modi? Why is there no coverage of the charges against Kamal Nath? Could it be that he does not attract the opprobrium that justly comes the way of Narendra Modi because Kamal Nath’s indictment leads to questions about the Congress that no one is willing to ask? Or is it because he remains an important news source for prominent TV and print journalists? To cite just one instance, when the UPA II Government was sworn in, many well-known TV anchors were willing to claim on the basis of their ‘sources’ that he was in the running for the post of finance minister at the very moment he was headed for a Cabinet demotion.

Over the past six years of Congress rule, not one story on Kamal Nath’s role in the riots has appeared in the Indian media. In their book, When a Tree Shook Delhi, Manoj Mitta and HS Phoolka say, ‘Having spent two hours with the mob in front of Rakabganj Gurdwara, having done nothing to help the two Sikhs lying in a critical condition, having allowed the mob and the police to carry on with their hostilities against the targeted community, Kamal Nath was clearly part of the problem, not the solution. The unanswered questions about his role in the Rakabganj Gurdwara episode might well hold the key to uncovering the high-level conspiracy behind the 1984 carnage.’ We all know where that road leads.

The oft cited reason within news organisations is that there is no case pending against him, but that is because no one has bothered to dig out the truth. Even the effete Nanavati Commission that inquired into the events of 1984 had no choice but to observe that Kamal Nath’s testimony was “vague” and “not consistent with the evidence” and also that his version of events was “a little strange”. This was in 2005, a partial indictment. The contradictions in the various testimonies before the commission are so glaring that a little bit of effort by an investigative journalist would easily uncover the truth. Yet, the same media people who have no problem seeing Modi for the villain he is, have actually been busy extolling the virtues of Kamal Nath first as commerce minister and now as transport minister.

The Gujarat CM’s overhyped record on development has been exposed through due scrutiny, but have you read even a single report on why Kamal Nath was not seen fit to continue as commerce minister?

Today, the campaign against Narendra Modi thankfully does not have a solely Muslim face. Activists, journalists and lawyers have come together in admirable fashion to ensure that someone in authority is held to account for the tragic events in Gujarat. But the no less horrific massacre of Sikhs in Delhi is unfortunately an issue alive only for Sikhs. I know of only one non-Sikh journalist who has consistently written about it, Manoj Mitta. For the large part, the quest for justice for victims of the 1984 riots has been effectively muzzled, an also-ran cause figuring as an addendum to the 2002 riots in Gujarat.

OLDER COMMENTS FIRST

8 COMMENTS

Permalink

Very important point you make in this article. There should follow immediate action on part of the authorities in India. If there is prima facie evidence of the mob leading incident near parliament you have said in the article, then that is sufficient reason from a legal standpoint for a reopening of the case. Who is ruling party etc should have no interference with the due process of law, as the honourable PM has repeated himself in many forums many times before and will have no hesitation we think in doing so again, rule of law being part of his fiduciary responsibility in assuming charge as head of government of India.
As for media neglect, it is harder to understand what governs its coverage of injustice, there being so many cases. Comparisons in such matters of grave concern are always odeous, but it is said by some people in some places that the angle of a larger conspiracy causing continuing cause for concern is stronger in the other political case. There, the matter of the "provocation", the identity of what/who in actual fact caused the karsevak bogie of the sabarmati train to catch fire (refer to Godhra) in the first place is still a subject of doubt, legally , there being a publicly recognized larger context of a temple agenda and established use of tactical communal violence associated with electoral gains therein, which makes media give it more coverage as a matter of present relevance and public interest. How parties function is of high concern to the voting public.
This is not to say this injustice can be contextualised and therefore is different in qualitative terms from another injustice. Law should be upheld in all circumstances, even if people on the street like to make their own judgments.
Excellent article from OPEN, there should be more such bold and clear articles that fight for justice.

5 April 2010 | Pratap Singh

Permalink

How dare you write something like this? Now run for your life or the secular media and the Government will make your life hell. Henceforth you have become communal. You are doomed dude!
Either you are with Congress or you are communal. Don't you get it??

6 April 2010 | Sandy

Permalink

I dont blame Congress.They have purchased media people.The only way to drop their TRP -BJP leaders should byocott selective english media (NDTV,CNNIBN,Times Now.....).

7 April 2010 | PintuB

Permalink

I congratulate OPEN for carrying this article.

8 April 2010 | Dinkar Kamani

Permalink

Mr Singh (commenter on thread top), is it your suggestion that just because Mrs Gandhi was killed in cold blood by her own bodyguards and it was established clearly that this was the case that there is a difference in the understanding of the riots that followed? Justice is justice, there is no such thing as collective community punishment, that is a tribal attitude and if India is to prosper as a democracy we need to be clear about guilt and innocence on an individual basis.

12 April 2010 | ramesh Saran

Permalink

The Congress Party will not do anything unless the courts, the opposition, or the media roast them over the coals. What action did the Congress take against PC Sethi (Kuo oil deal), Verappa Moily (Moilly tapes scandal), HKL Bhagat (perhaps the biggest killer of Sikhs in 1984), or even Sajjan Kumar? Why, even Shashi Tharoor was asked to bow out because Congress needs BJP's support to get the Finance Bill 2010 passed. Congress has been to bed with corrupt politicians like Lalu Prasad Yadav, Mursoli Maran, and D Raja - why should we expect Sonia's Congress to suddenly grow a conscience over Kamal Nath?

20 April 2010 | Rajendra

Permalink

Good to know that someone hasn't forgotten.

19 June 2010 | Rohini

Permalink

Indeed we haven't read about this in mainstream media...

30 June 2010 | Mehak

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

CAPTCHA
NOTE: Please enter letters [case sensitive] in the box provided before you submit your comment. This is to prevent automated spam submissions
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.