
“We’ve ordered Thai,” says my host, sheepishly under his breath, “I think there may be some veggie stuff in there.” I discreetly exit before the food is served, heading off a culinary crisis, to the other dinner on my evening’s itinerary. “I can’t believe you don’t eat meat,” squeals Manisha in equal parts dismay and disbelief soon after I walk through the door. “Now you’re eating leftovers!” she protests, as her cook serves me delicious aloo parathas, and the rest of her guests tuck into their carnivore-friendly feast.
Over the past twenty years in the United States, I have survived congealed dorm food, plates upon plates of grilled vegetables, a stroke-inducing diet of pizza, fries and pasta, and finally, ten blissful years in that vegetarian mecca, San Francisco. All this to return to a new and improved India, where I have once again joined the ranks of the gastronomically challenged; a “special needs” person with a dietary disability, i.e., my aversion to animal flesh. As with the disabled, I am obliged to signal my presence in advance if I am to be entertained. “You better let me know if you are coming,” warns an acquaintance on inviting me to a book party at her place. “I’ll be making a vegetarian curry just for you because everyone else eats meat.”
India maybe home to the greatest number of vegetarians—300-odd million at last count—but its wealthier citizens are voraciously carnivorous in aspiration, and increasingly so in their diet. In the land of Gandhi, meat is a basic food group in the yuppie meal plan—bacon for breakfast, burgers for lunch, kebabs for dinner. Meat is the new black.
Back in the dark days of pre-liberalisation, Punjabi friends I grew up with in Delhi ate meat with regularity and relish, as in two to three times a week at home and each time they ate out. My disdain for the stuff was at worst a ‘Madrasi’ affectation that they did their cheerful best to cure: “Just taste the mutton pickle. Promise you’ll love it.” My culinary naysaying was deemed incorrigible, but there was always plenty for me to eat at any table I was invited to join.
“Samira, you should have told me she was vegetarian,” grumbled Mrs D, the matriarch of my dorm-mate’s host-family, on a damp New England afternoon in 1987. Within minutes of walking through the door at my first American home-cooked meal, I’d driven my hostess right back into her kitchen in a frantic effort to drum up something other than a side of boiled peas. It was the first inkling that my dietary restrictions were not merely different, but also onerous on those tasked with feeding me. Two decades later and I am right back where I started: a mortified fresh-off-the-boat emigre caught in a gastronomical faux pas at a meal hosted by the natives. “It’s deja vu all over again,” as the patron saint of non sequiturs, Yogi Berra, would say.
In aspiring India, we lowly vegetarians have fallen from grace and right off the map, and are now entirely invisible to food section editors in upmarket publications. Restaurant reviews, for instance, rarely mention vegetarian items on the menu (except when unavoidable as with cheap eats like bhelpuri, dosas or chaat). Gourmet cuisine is clearly not for us shakahari chumps. Titled ‘How to be a Culinary Show-off’, a weekend cover story in Mint lists the following “envy-inducing table”: Khow Suey (with chicken and eggs), Naga-style pork, chicken tea soup, wintry sausage and mustard pasta, chicken stew, mustard fish and—trumpets please!—aubergine in a garlic-yogurt sauce.
Vegetables are déclassé, as are vegetarians. We are far too low-rent to accommodate either on the menu or at the table—even our own. Invited to a vegetarian friend’s birthday celebration, a young IT executive grouses, “But there won’t be anything to eat.” Others may call in advance merely to uphold the rules of good hospitality: “You are serving a couple of non-veg dishes, right?” A self-deprived hostess is hardly good reason for her guests to do without, be it for an occasional meal.
Of the various meats, beef is the ultimate standard-bearer of cool, a cultural signifier that denotes membership in a cosmopolitan India whose taste for the once-forbidden meat marks its distance from the old. What was once low caste is now high class, served up in trendy restaurants with nary a chicken tikka in sight. With the exception of five-star hotels, most upscale dining in Bangalore is studiedly not-Indian. At least part of this newfound meat fetishism reflects our desire to be seen as jetsetting bon vivants with a discriminating palate. On my first night out in Bangalore, an immaculately hip woman at our table fussed for half an hour to triumphantly settle on beef stroganoff—the entree of choice in frozen TV dinners across blue-collar America.
Among the UMARs (upper middle and rich Indians), meat-eating has become a competitive sport. Armed with their uber-expensive Weber grills, the elite routinely stage barbecue cook-offs, their tables groaning under the weight of dead creatures imported from corners of the world: New Zealand lamb, Canadian bacon, Angus beef, Niman Ranch burgers, Norwegian salmon, anything that breathes is grist to the almighty grill.
In her book, Curry: A Tale of Cooks and Conquerors, Elizabeth Collingham describes the colonial tradition of the Burra Khana. East India merchants loaded their tables with turkeys “you could not see over—round of Beef, boiled roast Beef, loin of Veal for a side dish and roast big capons.” And that was just the first course, to be soon followed by a second course of beefsteaks, pigeon pies, chicken drumsticks and quails. “It was on their dinner tables the British in India most extravagantly displayed their wealth and status,” driven by their middle class determination to imitate the English aristocrat. In rushing headlong toward the future—our lavish, epicurean tastes apiece with our global swagger—we have followed dutifully in the steps of our past masters, fully embracing meat as the sign of cultural virility and power.
“Is the baby eating chicken yet?” demands my Jat husband over the phone from San Francisco, suspecting a conspiracy to corrupt his child with my TamBram squeamishness. “You are not raising her vegetarian, are you?” asks a friend, as I skip past the cured meats at the local gourmet bazaar, with my eighteen-month old in tow. God forbid, I should deprive my child of a bright future as a well-adjusted carnivore. “No,” I want to say, “I’m raising her to eat well-fed meat-lovers like you.” They say human flesh tastes a lot like chicken. Yum!





















































OLDER COMMENTS FIRST
8 COMMENTS
Permalink
I don't understand why modern editors have no compunction letting such write-ups through. The premise of this piece, for example, seems to be 'hey! I used to live in Umrikka. Therefore I should have better taste."
The entire story is a whimsical generalization which can neither be proven nor be disputed. For every quote the author cites, there is surely a quote that says the exact opposite some 3 tables/ feet next to her. That is the complexity of a land that has 1.2 billion people -- and that's nothing new either. Nor is it surprising to any Indian with the remotest sense of history.
I just hope editors show respect to the readers and don't take them for idiots who'd be wowed by the novelty of meat eating Indians that an Umrikka returned woman discovers.
Permalink
Was sorry to gather from your piece that to you, 'well-heeled Indian' means Hindu, exclusively. My family has been eating beef in India for centuries, we thought it was part of our culture, now I learn that all this time we've been aping the ways of working class America. Left a nasty taste in the mouth, this piece.
Permalink
Maryam, yes, I should have noted that beef has long been part of the cuisine of Muslims, Parsis, etc. in brackets. It was an oversight. But to clarfiy: the beef stroganoff example was less about the beef than the stroganoff. The person seemed to think ordering the dish made her look cool and upper class because it was Western, hence the irony. In any case, the bit about beef is a very small part of the essay. Am sorry it colored your reading of the entire essay, which is not about what people eat, but why they eat it in these status-conscious times.
Permalink
While I can certainly understand the fuss over someone picking beef stroganoff and imagining it to be cool, I can't understand how such a huge generalization is being made about the number of so called elitist Indians who eat meat to look westernized. This is a kind of reverse snobbishness - so much for laying into the attitude of the modern Indian.
PS: I live in Bangalore (it's now 10 years since I moved here) and what you say about not many Indian restaurants couldn't be further from the truth. Maybe you'd do better writing about real and meaningful issues rather than some pseudo intellectual politically correct non-events.
Permalink
This is ridiculous! The writer describes SF as "vegetarian mecca", while giving the impression that B'lore is a vegetarian's graveyard! I don't know if she has heard of Shanthi Sagars...oh wait, they are not "upscale" enough for the writer. Having stayed both in SF and B'lore, I know what rubbish the writer here is trying to feed us.
I am primarily a veggie, who occasionally would eat fish, but I never make a fuss about my non-veg friends or of their eating habits. Even when I was in B'lore most of the parties I went used to be strictly vegetarian. Don't think this has changed in few years. Otherwise, the writer is hanging out with the wrong people.
She also invokes Gandhi. But mocking others when someone mocks you is not exactly Gandhian, I presume.
Permalink
Hmm, you really need to get out more. I come from Kerala, and my family's not been vegetarian going back generations. To say that meat/chicken/fish is newly cool is utter nonsense. Sure, there are more restaurants serving different cuisines, but that's equally true of New York, Sydney or Cape Town. Welcome to the globalised world.
And like Arnab said, Bangalore is hardly a wasteland for vegetarians.
Frankly, the insinuation that people are eating non-vegetarian food to be "cool" is patronising and insulting.
Permalink
Dear Lakshmi,
I loved the general sense of humour in the article. It was breezy and well written, even if a little skewered.
While in a certain sense you pinned the 'meat fetish' of the UMAR (your terms) crowd, I do beg to differ.
What you are describing is in essence, a minuscule cultural shift in a small section of the well heeled (or wishing to appear well heeled) urban elite. Now, madam, I ask, what percentage of the Indian population are carnivores?
Amazing as it may sound, turns out the figures straddle around a whopping 70 percent. The staple protein intake among a large section of the Dalit and OBC populace happens to be sourced from animals. 7 out of 10 Indians eat animals. As for how the dietary patterns gets represented in the mainstream media is, of course, an entirely different matter.
Your writing, though entertaining, was disappointingly elitist. Perhaps it is time you got off that Brahminical high horse and focussed on issues that matter.
Vegetarianism is a lifestyle choice, and going by your logic, I am justified in frowning upon your lack of animal protein intake. Meanwhile, I'll blissfully dig through my chicken curry, thank you very much.
Regards,
Rahul G
(a carnivorous, though admittedly not-so-well-heeled Brahmin, apologies!)
Permalink
Dear Lakshmi,
I have to congratulate you for a well-written article with gentle humour and wry observation about shifting Indian habits. However, in the final analysis, I must take up cause with Rahul and respond to your elitist, Tam Brahm perspectives. Indeed, being Tam Brahm yourself, it is perhaps not so difficult for you to cast your mind across to the neighbouring state of Kerala, where beef has been a staple of Hindu, Christian and Muslim diets across the state for ever so long.
Indeed, The Kerala 'Parotta' and chilli beef have been low cost options for students such as myself for years now. It is a common site to see slaughtered cattle in the markets in small towns and big cities in Kerala, and abbattoirs are often right in the middle of the city, for easy access to the markets (look at Cochin, and its Abbattoir in Kaloor, right next to the Bus stand, across from St George's church, and a stone's throw from the Shiva temple at Kaloor)
Indeed, along with Avial, delicious appam and stew (which comes in veg, chicken, lamb and beef varieties), it is the beef olarthiyathu (beef sauteed with coconut slices) that vie for recognition as the national dish of Kerala, and has found pride of place in roadside hotels, Five star restaurants, and all manner of eating establishments in between.
Finally, Keralan non-vegetarian hotel menus often have sections titled "vegetarian", "chicken", "fish" and "beef", detailing such delicacies as the chilli beef and the kerala beef curry. This has been a part of the cuicine for many many years now, and frankly, predates your occasionally-eats-beef-at-the-Leela brand of well-heeled Punjabi/ Marwari socialite.
Beef is seen by most families as a cheap and viable alternative for fat/protein diet in Keralan meals, and is sold both at butcheries as well as by Government-owned, PUBLIC SECTOR companies like Meat Products of India Ltd.
When you write a generalisation for the whole country in such a careless and sweeping manner, maybe you should check first to see if the numbers really add up, and if you could restrict your sample to the population that you truly know about.
Add your comment